Professor Hooper measuring plant productivity |
Professor David Hooper, a professor
at Western Washington University, has been receiving a lot of attention, including his most recent article in Nature,
for his unique perspective on the relationship between levels of biodiversity
and ecosystem services. What is unique about
this aspect of thinking is that many people think that reduced ecosystem
services have negative impacts on species, reducing levels of biodiversity, not
the other way around.
order to further explore this perspective, Professor Hooper and his team at
Western Washington University have performed an enormous meta-analysis, looking
at 192 studies, which include 574 experiments. In particular, they examined studies that dealt with a
manipulation of species richness, randomized data and looked at a response to a
change in ecosystem process rates.
With this wealth of information, Professor Hooper began to evaluate the
relationship. They looked at and
analyzed data for several conditions to attempt to illustrate the relevance of
this relationship such as plant productivity and species richness of primary
producers. When examining this data, they found that with more species lost
there were greater impacts on the rates of productivity, as seen the graph
below:
This figure not only illustrates that loss of species has a
great impact on the ecosystem process of productivity, but it makes a point to
emphasize that it is not an negligible impact. Many people assume that the magnitude of this sort of
effects are greatly outshone by those that we are familiar with, such as global
warming, invasive species, etc. But, as you can see from the Y-axis on the
right of this graph, the resulting loss of productivity due to species loss is
actually comparable to many of these other more familiar effects on ecosystem
services.
While
Professor Hooper and his team were definitely concerned with being able to
illustrate this relationship, what they really wanted to know was whether it
mattered, as evidenced by the title of his presentation. Hooper said that there were three
questions that he wanted to answer with this study with his last question
having the most resonance: In terms of how ecosystems are actually changing,
does it matter? In order to really
answer this question Professor Hooper emphasized the need to look at how
ecosystems are changing. Professor
Hooper suggests that the best way to determine this is to look at the link
between ecosystem functions and services.
While his data does suggest that how ecosystems are changing does matter
in terms of the effects of species richness, there needs to be much more future
research. In order to evaluate the
relevance of this study and to determine whether the species loss patterns are
reflected in real life, there needs to be a large increase in the scale of
these experiments and a better way to replicate species loss. It will be exciting to see what
Professor Hooper elucidates next.
http://onlinefast.org/wwutoday/features/could-biodiversity-loss-rival-impacts-of-climate-change
I just came to your post and reading above thing it is very impressive me and it is very nice blog. Thanks a lot for sharing this.
ReplyDeleteATP Ratio Assay Kit
Thanks!
Mark Holland